Choosing the right 3D printer can feel like navigating a maze of technical jargon and competing claims. For hobbyists and educators alike, the decision often boils down to a few key players.
In this head-to-head comparison, we’re pitting the accessible 3D Systems Cube against the established powerhouse, MakerBot. Both offer distinct advantages and cater to different user needs.
Are you looking for simplicity and affordability, or are you after advanced features and a vast community? Let’s dive deep into the cube 3d printer vs makerbot to uncover which one is the perfect fit for your next project.
Specs at a Glance
| Feature | cube 3d printer | makerbot |
|---|---|---|
| Print Technology | FDM | FDM |
| Build Volume (W x D x H) | 100 x 100 x 100 mm | Varies by model (e.g., 252 x 200 x 150 mm for Method X) |
| Layer Resolution | 200 microns | 100-400 microns |
| Nozzle Diameter | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported Materials | PLA, ABS, PETG | PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon, PC, TPU, PVA (depending on model) |
| Connectivity | USB, SD Card | USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet |
| Software | Cube Software, Cura | MakerBot Print, MakerBot Mobile |
| Build Plate Type | Heated Bed | Heated Bed |
| Enclosure | Open-frame | Open-frame or enclosed (depending on model) |
| User Interface | LCD Screen, Buttons | Touchscreen LCD, Buttons |
| Assembly | Pre-assembled | Pre-assembled or semi-assembled kits |
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Build Volume
- Cube 3d Printer: Typically offers a smaller build volume, around 6 x 6 x 6 inches (152 x 152 x 152 mm). This is suitable for smaller, more compact prints but limits the size of projects you can undertake.
- Makerbot: Generally provides larger build volumes, with models often exceeding 9 x 5.7 x 5.9 inches (229 x 145 x 150 mm) and some reaching over 11 x 5.7 x 6.5 inches (280 x 145 x 165 mm). This allows for more ambitious and larger-scale prints.
- Winner: MakerBot
Materials & Filament Compatibility
- Cube 3d Printer: Primarily uses proprietary PLA and ABS cartridges. This simplifies material loading but restricts users to specific, often more expensive, filament options.
- Makerbot: Supports a wider range of materials, including PLA, Tough PLA, PETG, and others, often using standard 1.75mm filament spools. This offers greater flexibility in material choice and cost savings.
- Winner: MakerBot
Ease of Use & Setup
- Cube 3d Printer: Known for its user-friendly interface and plug-and-play setup, making it a good option for beginners. The proprietary cartridge system further simplifies the printing process.
- Makerbot: Also aims for user-friendliness with intuitive software and often features like auto-leveling. However, some users may find the initial setup and calibration slightly more involved than Cube.
- Winner: cube 3d printer
Print Quality & Resolution
- Cube 3d Printer: Produces decent print quality for its class, suitable for hobbyist and educational purposes. Layer resolution is generally acceptable but may not match the fine detail of higher-end machines.
- Makerbot: Often boasts higher resolution capabilities and can achieve finer details and smoother finishes, especially in its professional or more advanced consumer models. This makes it suitable for more demanding applications.
- Winner: MakerBot
Software & Connectivity
- Cube 3d Printer: Utilizes its own proprietary software, which is straightforward but may lack advanced customization options. Connectivity is typically via USB.
- Makerbot: Offers the MakerBot Print software, which is feature-rich and allows for more control over print settings. Connectivity often includes USB, Wi-Fi, and Ethernet for more versatile operation.
- Winner: MakerBot
Price Point
- Cube 3d Printer: Generally positioned as a more budget-friendly option, making it accessible for entry-level users and educational institutions. The cost of proprietary cartridges can add up over time.
- Makerbot: Tends to be in a higher price bracket, reflecting its advanced features, larger build volumes, and professional capabilities. While the initial investment is higher, it often offers better value for more serious users.
- Winner: cube 3d printer
Durability & Build Quality
- Cube 3d Printer: Features a robust and enclosed design, contributing to its stability and safety, especially in educational settings. The build quality is generally solid for its intended use.
- Makerbot: Often utilizes higher-quality components and a more industrial-grade construction, leading to greater durability and longevity. This is particularly evident in their professional series.
- Winner: MakerBot
Community & Support
- Cube 3d Printer: Has a dedicated user base, but the proprietary nature of its consumables can sometimes limit community-driven troubleshooting and aftermarket support.
- Makerbot: Benefits from a large and active global community, extensive online resources, tutorials, and generally strong manufacturer support. This makes finding help and sharing knowledge easier.
- Winner: MakerBot
Winner by Category
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Ease of Use (Beginner) | cube 3d printer |
| Print Quality (General) | makerbot |
| Material Versatility | makerbot |
| Build Volume | makerbot |
| Connectivity | makerbot |
| Community Support | makerbot |
| Value for Entry-Level | cube 3d printer |
What They Have in Common
- Print Technology: Both the Cube 3D Printer and MakerBot utilize Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology, which is a widely adopted and accessible method for 3D printing. This means they both build objects layer by layer by extruding melted thermoplastic filament.
- Filament Compatibility: A significant commonality is their use of 1.75 mm filament diameter. This standardized size ensures a broad availability of printing materials from various manufacturers, offering users flexibility in their choice of filaments like PLA, ABS, and PETG.
- Heated Build Plate: Both printer lines generally come equipped with a heated build plate. This feature is crucial for ensuring good adhesion of the first layer to the build surface, which helps prevent warping and improves the overall success rate of prints.
- User-Friendly Software: While the specific software differs, both Cube and MakerBot aim to provide relatively user-friendly slicing and printing management software. This software translates 3D models into printable instructions for the respective printers.
- Open-Source Community (to an Extent): While MakerBot has a more established and extensive community, both platforms benefit from the broader open-source 3D printing ecosystem. This means users can find a wealth of online resources, troubleshooting tips, and community-developed profiles.
Cube 3D Printer Vs Makerbot Buying Guide
Ease of Use
For beginners, the Cube 3D Printer often takes the lead. Its plug-and-play nature, intuitive interface, and pre-assembled design mean you can be printing within minutes of unboxing. MakerBot, while also user-friendly, might require a bit more initial setup and calibration, appealing to those who enjoy tinkering and have a slightly higher tolerance for technical adjustments. (See Also: Demeyere 5 Plus Vs Atlantis )
Print Quality and Resolution
Both printers offer respectable print quality. However, MakerBot generally has a reputation for slightly finer detail and smoother finishes, especially on their higher-end models. The Cube can produce good results, but achieving MakerBot’s level of polish might require more attention to print settings and material selection. For professional prototypes or highly detailed models, MakerBot might have an edge.
Material Options and Versatility
MakerBot printers typically offer a wider range of filament materials, including various plastics, flexibles, and composites. This versatility allows for a broader spectrum of applications, from functional prototypes to artistic creations. The Cube, while supporting standard PLA and ABS, might have a more limited selection of official or compatible third-party materials, potentially restricting some advanced printing projects.
Community and Support
MakerBot boasts a larger and more established community. This translates to abundant online resources, tutorials, troubleshooting forums, and shared print profiles. While the Cube has its users, the depth of community support for MakerBot is generally more extensive, providing a valuable resource for users encountering issues or seeking inspiration. (See Also: Nikon 50 1 8 Vs 1 4 )
Who Should Buy What?
Buy cube 3d printer If…
- You are a beginner looking for a straightforward and easy-to-use entry-level 3D printer.
- Your printing needs are limited to smaller objects with less demanding material requirements.
- You prioritize a simple setup and are less concerned with advanced features or extensive material choices.
Buy makerbot If…
- You require a more robust and versatile 3D printer capable of handling a wider range of materials and complex prints.
- You are an educator, hobbyist, or professional who needs reliable performance and a larger build volume.
- You value advanced features, better connectivity options, and access to a strong user community and support network.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which printer is better for a complete beginner?
For a complete beginner, the Cube 3D Printer is generally the better choice. Its focus on simplicity and out-of-the-box functionality minimizes the learning curve. You can often start printing with minimal technical knowledge, making it an excellent entry point into the world of 3D printing without feeling overwhelmed by complex settings or calibration procedures.
Can I print complex designs with both?
Yes, both printers are capable of printing complex designs. However, MakerBot often excels in achieving finer details and smoother surfaces on intricate models due to its potentially higher resolution capabilities and wider material compatibility. The Cube can handle complexity, but achieving the same level of detail might require more print tuning and potentially slower print speeds.
Are there limitations on the materials I can use?
Yes, there can be limitations. The Cube often works best with its proprietary filament cartridges or specific compatible materials, which can sometimes be more expensive. MakerBot printers generally offer greater flexibility, supporting a wider array of standard filaments from different manufacturers, allowing for more material choices and potentially cost savings. (See Also: Samsung Pro Vs Evo 850 )
How does noise level compare between the two?
Both 3D printers produce some operational noise, primarily from the stepper motors and cooling fans. Generally, neither is silent, but the perceived noise level can vary between specific models within each brand. Enclosing the printer or placing it in a well-ventilated but separate area can help mitigate noise for both the Cube and MakerBot.
Which printer offers better long-term value?
The long-term value depends on your needs. If ease of use and quick setup are paramount, the Cube offers immediate value. However, if you anticipate exploring a wider range of materials, requiring higher print detail, and benefiting from extensive community support for future projects, a MakerBot might offer better long-term value and a more expansive printing journey.
Final Verdict
For those prioritizing an immediate and hassle-free 3D printing experience, the Cube 3D Printer shines with its user-friendly design. However, for users seeking greater material versatility, finer print quality, and access to a vast community for support and innovation, MakerBot emerges as the more robust and adaptable choice for a wider range of projects and future exploration. MakerBot offers a more comprehensive ecosystem for enthusiasts and professionals alike.
Winner: MakerBot