Behringer Fx2000 vs Lexicon Mx200: Budget vs. Brand

Versus
By Maya Collins April 22, 2026
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This post may contain affiliate links, which means I may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Choosing the right effects processor can dramatically elevate your sound. For many producers and live sound engineers, the decision often comes down to balancing budget with sonic reputation. This comparison dives deep into two popular contenders in the multi-effects unit arena.

We’re pitting the feature-rich Behringer FX2000 against the established sonic pedigree of the Lexicon MX200. Both units promise a wide array of effects, but how do they stack up in terms of quality, usability, and overall value?

Whether you’re outfitting a home studio or upgrading your live rig, understanding the nuances between these two processors is key. Let’s break down the Behringer FX2000 vs. Lexicon MX200 to help you make an informed choice.

Specs at a Glance

Featurebehringer fx2000lexicon mx200
Number of Effects71 algorithms99 presets
Effect TypesReverb, Delay, Chorus, Flanger, Phaser, Rotary, Tremolo, Vibrato, Auto-Wah, Pitch Shifter, Multi-effectsReverb, Delay, Chorus, Flanger, Phaser, Rotary, Tremolo, Pitch Shifter, Multi-effects
Simultaneous Effects22
Display2-digit LED2-digit LED
Footswitch InputYesYes
MIDI In/OutYesYes
Stereo Inputs/OutputsYesYes
Analog InsertsNoNo
Dedicated Tap TempoYesYes
User Presets10099
Build QualityPlastic chassisMetal chassis
Power SupplyExternal adapterExternal adapter

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Effects Quality

  • Behringer Fx2000: Offers a wide range of effects, including reverbs, delays, chorus, flanger, phaser, and more. While versatile, the sound quality is generally considered good for the price but can sometimes lack the polish and depth of higher-end units. Some users find certain algorithms can sound a bit digital or less nuanced.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Known for its signature Lexicon reverb sound, which is highly regarded in the industry for its smooth, natural, and musical character. It also includes other effects like delays and modulation. The overall audio fidelity is a significant step up, providing a more professional and polished sound, especially in its reverb algorithms.
  • Winner: Lexicon MX200

Algorithm Variety

  • Behringer Fx2000: Boasts a vast number of algorithms, often exceeding 100, covering a broad spectrum of sonic possibilities. This extensive library can be a pro for experimentation but also a con as the sheer number can be overwhelming, and not all algorithms are equally well-implemented or useful.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Features a more curated selection of high-quality effects, focusing on core essentials like reverbs, delays, and modulation. While fewer in number compared to the FX2000, each algorithm is generally well-designed and excels in its intended purpose, offering a more focused and effective toolkit.
  • Winner: Behringer FX2000

User Interface & Control

  • Behringer Fx2000: Features a straightforward panel with dedicated knobs for common parameters and a somewhat basic LCD screen. Navigation can be a bit menu-divey for deeper edits, but basic adjustments are usually quick. The layout is functional but not always the most intuitive for complex sound design.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Presents a dual-engine design with dedicated controls for each engine and a clear, informative display. It offers a good balance between accessibility for quick edits and depth for more detailed parameter tweaking. The workflow is generally considered more streamlined and user-friendly for its core functions.
  • Winner: Lexicon MX200

Connectivity & I/O

  • Behringer Fx2000: Typically includes standard 1/4″ inputs and outputs, often in stereo. It may also feature MIDI In/Out for control and program changes. The connectivity is sufficient for most home studio or live sound applications but lacks more professional options like digital I/O.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Also offers 1/4″ stereo inputs and outputs and MIDI connectivity. Some versions or configurations might include additional features like USB for potential firmware updates or basic control, though it generally sticks to analog and MIDI.
  • Winner: Tie

Build Quality & Durability

  • Behringer Fx2000: Behringer units are often built with plastic casings and can feel less robust than more expensive gear. While generally functional, long-term durability in demanding environments might be a concern for some users. They are designed to be budget-friendly, which often reflects in the materials.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Generally features a more solid metal chassis, giving it a more professional and durable feel. This build quality contributes to its perceived reliability and suitability for regular use in studios or live settings. It feels like it’s built to withstand more wear and tear.
  • Winner: Lexicon MX200

Dual Engine Processing

  • Behringer Fx2000: Allows for processing two independent effects simultaneously, which can be routed in series or parallel. This offers flexibility in creating complex layered sounds. The implementation is functional, enabling creative combinations of different effect types.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Its dual-engine architecture is a core strength, allowing you to run two distinct effects (e.g., reverb and delay) at once. This is particularly useful for creating rich, multi-dimensional soundscapes. The integration of these two engines is seamless and contributes significantly to its sonic versatility.
  • Winner: Lexicon MX200

Price & Value

  • Behringer Fx2000: Stands out for its extremely affordable price point, offering a vast array of effects for minimal investment. It’s an excellent choice for beginners, those on a tight budget, or for experimentation without a significant financial commitment. The value proposition is high in terms of sheer quantity of features for the cost.
  • Lexicon Mx200: While more expensive than the FX2000, it offers exceptional value for its superior sound quality and professional-grade reverbs. It provides a taste of Lexicon’s renowned sonic character at a more accessible price than their higher-end units, making it a great bang-for-your-buck option for those prioritizing audio fidelity.
  • Winner: Behringer FX2000

Presets & Editability

  • Behringer Fx2000: Comes with a large number of factory presets, providing quick starting points for various sounds. Deep editing is possible, but the interface can make it a bit cumbersome to fine-tune parameters extensively. The sheer volume of presets can sometimes lead to less focus on individual sound design.
  • Lexicon Mx200: Offers a good selection of high-quality presets that showcase its strengths, especially in reverb. It allows for detailed editing of parameters within each effect engine, and the dual-engine setup enables creative combining of presets. The focus is on quality and usability of its core sonic palette.
  • Winner: Lexicon MX200

Winner by Category

CategoryWinner
Value for Moneybehringer fx2000
Reverb Qualitylexicon mx200
Number of Effectsbehringer fx2000
Build Qualitylexicon mx200
Overall Versatilitybehringer fx2000
Ease of Use (Preset Navigation)lexicon mx200

What They Have in Common

  • Effect Variety: Both units offer a comprehensive range of effects, including staple reverbs, delays, modulations, and pitch shifting. They aim to provide a versatile toolkit for various audio processing needs.
  • Dual Engine Processing: Each processor allows for the use of two independent effects simultaneously, offering the flexibility to combine different sounds or create more complex textures. This dual-engine capability is a key feature for creative sound design.
  • Preset Management: Both the FX2000 and MX200 provide a good number of user-definable presets, allowing you to save your favorite settings for quick recall. This is essential for live performance and efficient studio work.
  • Connectivity: Standard features like stereo inputs and outputs, along with MIDI connectivity, are present on both units. This ensures they can be easily integrated into most studio or live setups.
  • Footswitch Support: The inclusion of footswitch inputs on both devices is a significant practical advantage for live musicians, enabling hands-free control over effect engagement and bypass.
  • Digital Display: Both units utilize a simple 2-digit LED display for preset selection and parameter feedback. While basic, it gets the job done for navigating the available options.

Behringer Fx2000 Vs Lexicon Mx200 Buying Guide

Budget Considerations

When comparing the Behringer FX2000 and the Lexicon MX200, budget is a primary differentiator. The Behringer FX2000 typically sits at a significantly lower price point, making it an attractive option for individuals or studios with limited funds. This affordability allows for experimentation and the acquisition of multiple units if desired. However, it’s crucial to weigh this cost-effectiveness against the potential for a more premium user experience and sound quality from the Lexicon. (See Also: Apple Iphone 14 Vs 15 )

Sound Quality and Effects Variety

The core of any effects processor lies in its sound quality and the diversity of its effects. The Lexicon MX200 is renowned for its pristine digital reverbs and delays, often associated with professional studio standards. The Behringer FX2000, while offering a wide array of effects, may present a more “characterful” or sometimes less refined sound, especially in its more extreme settings. Consider what type of sonic signature you are aiming for; if crystal-clear, spacious reverbs are paramount, the Lexicon might have an edge. If you seek a broader palette of creative, perhaps even slightly gritty, effects, the FX2000 could be more versatile.

Build Quality and User Interface

The physical construction and ease of use are vital for a smooth workflow. The Behringer FX2000 often features a more robust, metal chassis, suggesting greater durability for live performance or frequent transport. Its interface might be more knob-per-function, offering immediate control over parameters, though it can sometimes feel cluttered. The Lexicon MX200, while perhaps less physically imposing, often boasts a cleaner, more intuitive user interface, making navigation and parameter adjustment straightforward. Think about how you intend to interact with the device; for hands-on control, the FX2000 might appeal, while for streamlined operation, the MX200 could be superior.

Connectivity and Features

Examining the connectivity options and specific features can reveal which processor better suits your setup. Both units offer standard audio I/O, but check for features like digital I/O (S/PDIF, ADAT) if you require integration with digital consoles or multi-track recorders. The Behringer FX2000 often includes a broader range of effect types and modulation options, sometimes with more extensive editing capabilities within each effect. The Lexicon MX200, while potentially having fewer total effect types, focuses on delivering high-quality versions of its core algorithms. Consider your specific routing needs and whether you prioritize sheer quantity of effects or the refined quality of fewer, well-executed ones. (See Also: Texas Vs Wyoming Llc )

Who Should Buy What?

Buy behringer fx2000 If…

  • You are on a tight budget and need a wide array of effects without breaking the bank.
  • You are a beginner or hobbyist looking for a feature-rich multi-effects unit to experiment with.
  • You prioritize a large number of algorithms and are willing to explore Behringer’s specific sound character.
  • You don’t mind a plastic chassis and a simpler interface in exchange for more effect options.

Buy lexicon mx200 If…

  • You value Lexicon’s renowned reverb algorithms and are looking for that signature sound.
  • You prefer a more robust build quality for frequent use or live performance.
  • You are a musician or producer who needs reliable and professional-sounding effects for mixing or live sound.
  • You appreciate a slightly more streamlined approach to effect selection, focusing on quality over sheer quantity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which processor is better for live vocals?

For live vocals, the Lexicon MX200 generally holds an advantage due to its renowned reverb algorithms, which are often described as smoother and more natural-sounding. This can help vocals cut through a mix without sounding overly processed or artificial. The Behringer FX2000 can certainly be used for live vocals and offers more diverse effects, but its reverbs might require more careful tweaking to achieve a professional polish.

Can the Behringer FX2000 compete with the Lexicon MX200 in terms of reverb quality?

While the Behringer FX2000 offers a wide array of effects, including reverbs, it typically doesn’t reach the same level of sonic refinement as the Lexicon MX200, particularly in its reverb algorithms. Lexicon is celebrated for its industry-standard reverbs. The FX2000’s reverbs can be very usable and offer more variety, but for pristine, spacious, and natural-sounding reverb, the MX200 often has the edge.

Is the Behringer FX2000 more versatile than the Lexicon MX200?

The Behringer FX2000 is generally considered more versatile in terms of the sheer number and variety of effects it offers. It includes a broader range of modulation, delay, distortion, and other specialized effects. The Lexicon MX200, while excelling in its core reverb and delay offerings, has a more focused feature set. If you need a wide palette of different effect types, the FX2000 might be the more versatile choice. (See Also: Swagbucks Vs Survey Junkie )

Which unit is better for a beginner producer?

For a beginner producer, both units have their merits. The Behringer FX2000 might be more appealing due to its lower cost and a wider array of effects to experiment with, allowing for exploration of different sonic possibilities. However, the Lexicon MX200’s more straightforward interface and high-quality core effects could provide a more focused and less overwhelming learning experience for essential studio sounds like reverb and delay.

What are the main differences in their build quality?

The Behringer FX2000 often features a more rugged, metal chassis, which can be advantageous for live use or for those who require a more robust build. The Lexicon MX200, while still well-built, might have a less imposing physical presence and could be perceived as more of a studio-focused unit. However, both are generally considered reliable pieces of equipment for their respective price points.

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Behringer FX2000 and the Lexicon MX200 hinges on your priorities. The FX2000 offers immense value with a vast array of effects at a budget-friendly price, making it a versatile tool for experimentation. The MX200, however, stands out with its superior reverb quality and more polished sound, ideal for professional vocal processing and creating spacious ambient textures. For those prioritizing pristine sound and industry-standard reverbs, the Lexicon MX200 is the superior choice despite its higher cost and narrower effect selection.

Winner: Lexicon Mx200